Anglo-Saxon and Viking Mytholgy essays

Anglo-Saxon and Viking Mytholgy essays Back in the times of the Anglos and Vikings, myths and many different fantasies were told of the beginning and the end; creation and death were the most popular. These people explain the gaps between how and why of life to everybody in the ways they knew best. They used Oral Tradition as a way to communicate these problems and such. They would communicate using their myths, songs and legends. The popular place for these oral traditions were in the mead-halls. The problem with Oral tradition was that it would be passed person to person and myths and stories would be changed around, and no one in these days knows the ORIGINAL stories. In the Anglo-Saxon times Oral Tradition were told in riddles, songs, poetry and even in adventure tales. The stories and myths were focused on gods, heroes and warriors. They were at the top in the Anglos society. A very important god of the Anglos was Woden, according to them he was hung on a tree for nine days and nights and was pierced by a spear and in that he found wisdom, the secret of runes. Bilbo Baggins a Hobbit that is well respected in his town because he takes no risks and leaves safely at home. He faced many monsters that were very powerful, but he would use his clever mind to get him out of trouble. He found courage and gained lots of respect from others. ...

Is gun control an effective method of reducing crime

Is gun control an effective method of reducing crime Occasional Gun-Related Incidents Start the Discussion The subject of regulating firearm ownership has been a cause for  debate  between gun control proponents and their opponents. Rising rates of crime or occasional gun-related incidents always act as a match to light up this discussion. The issue mentioned above is a serious one and deserving of serious consideration. Each side has valid points to prove their case. However, gun control does not reduce crime, in most cases. Better ways of solving such issues are being sought as opposed to the much-accustomed way of  law  making. The debate on gun control will continue well into the future as long as guns are manufactured and used. The most prevalent argument by proponents of gun control is that countries with lower rates of gun ownership have lower rates of crimes. The above is simply not true and has been statistically disproven. The opposite is, in fact, true. Research has clearly shown that countries with higher rates of gun ownership have lower crime rates than countries with low gun ownership rates. The most probable cause for the above is that criminals are less likely to attack a citizen if there is a higher chance of the latter retaliating. In the second case, offenders with firearms have a higher chance of success if they know they will encounter victims who are unarmed. Citizens with firearms tend to be more empowered than their unarmed counterparts. Criminals in areas with low gun ownership rates have more power over their victims, and a higher success rate is an incentive to continue the practice. Therefore, reducing the rates of gun ownership would not have the desired effect of reducing crime. Deaths from Firearms Are Quite the Rarity The argument by gun control proponents that firearms are involved in many human deaths is unsubstantiated. According to certain publications, there are about seventy million privately owned firearms in the USA. Their primary uses are hunting, target practice, household, and business premise protection. Of all the homicides committed in the country in a single year, less than one percent involve the use of guns. The abovementioned statement shows that ninety-nine percent of guns do not participate in any loss of human life. The opponents of gun control are clearly right in this respect. Many firearm owners have a gun for self-defense purposes, and many of them have no criminal or violent intention of using the gun. In fact, many handguns are rarely fired and are only kept as a security contingency. Deaths from firearms are quite the rarity. Many more people die from illnesses, home, and vehicle accidents than from gun violence. The above fact involves children too who gun control prop onents usually use to strengthen their argument. You may be interested in: Torture Is Never Justified Smoking in Public Places Should Be Banned Single-Parent Children Behaviour Can Science Go Too Far? Media Influence With already so many gun laws in place, how do criminals manage to access firearms and ammunition? The above question goes to prove that gun control laws do not deter criminals with a desire to acquire and utilize guns. There exists a very extensive black market for guns that may be bigger and more developed than the legal guns and ammunition market. Constructing tougher and additional legislation to restrict gun ownership will have no effect on criminal individuals and organizations with no regard to already existing laws. If anything, more gun control would discourage citizens from making the effort to own firearms which, as been shown above, would lead to even higher crime rates. Laws also have loopholes that can be exploited by knowledgeable lawyers, who more often than not, represent powerful and dangerous criminals. More laws could open up more leeway to be exploited by those who are capable. More Gun Ownership Leads to More Citizenry Safety As can be vividly seen above, proponents of gun control do not have a compelling case. It is clear that more gun ownership leads to more citizenry safety. Certain structures can be put in place to reduce the access criminals have to guns, but the reasons provided by gun control proponents are irrational and unsubstantiated. Gun control would eventually do citizens more harm than good. Using firearms to reduce crime rates is an insurmountable task with no prior proof of success anywhere. Until better measures are found, it would be better to let citizens exercise their constitutional right to bear arms.